League Records by League Winning Percentage Report
2021-22 Season
| Team | Division | Class | League Record | Win % | |
| 1 | Cooperstown | CSC III | C | 10-0 | 1.000 |
| 1 | Utica Academy of Science | CSC II | C | 12-0 | 1.000 |
| 3 | Westmoreland/ Oriskany | CSC I | B | 9-2 | 0.818 |
| 4 | Clinton | CSC I | B | 7-2-1 | 0.750 |
| 4 | Frankfort-Schuyler | CSC II | C | 9-3 | 0.750 |
| 4 | Sauquoit Valley | CSC III | C | 7-2-1 | 0.750 |
| 7 | Canastota | CSC I | B | 6-2-1 | 0.722 |
| 8 | Herkimer | CSC II | C | 8-4 | 0.667 |
| 9 | Waterville | CSC III | C | 6-6-1 | 0.500 |
| 10 | Town of Webb | CSC II | D | 6-7-1 | 0.464 |
| 11 | Holland Patent | CSC I | B | 4-5-1 | 0.450 |
| 12 | Hamilton | CSC III | D | 4-6 | 0.400 |
| 13 | Poland | CSC III | D | 4-8 | 0.333 |
| 14 | West Canada Valley | CSC II | C | 2-9-1 | 0.208 |
| 15 | Mt. Markham | CSC III | C | 2-8 | 0.200 |
| 16 | Adirondack | CSC II | C | 2-10 | 0.167 |
| 16 | Remsen | CSC II | D | 2-10 | 0.167 |
| 18 | Sherburne-Earlville | CSC I | B | 1-8-1 | 0.150 |
| 19 | Little Falls | CSC I | B | 1-10 | 0.091 |
| 20 | Utica-Notre Dame | CSC | C | 0-0 | 0.000 |
| Team | Class | Division Record | Win % | |
| 1 | Westmoreland/ Oriskany | B | 8-2 | 0.800 |
| 2 | Clinton | B | 7-2-1 | 0.750 |
| 3 | Canastota | B | 7-2-1 | 0.750 |
| 4 | Holland Patent | B | 4-5-1 | 0.450 |
| 5 | Sherburne-Earlville | B | 1-9-1 | 0.136 |
| 6 | Little Falls | B | 1-8 | 0.111 |
| Team | Class | Division Record | Win % | |
| 1 | Utica Academy of Science | C | 12-0 | 1.000 |
| 2 | Frankfort-Schuyler | C | 9-3 | 0.750 |
| 3 | Herkimer | C | 8-4 | 0.667 |
| 4 | Town of Webb | D | 6-5-1 | 0.542 |
| 5 | West Canada Valley | C | 2-9-1 | 0.208 |
| 6 | Adirondack | C | 2-10 | 0.167 |
| 7 | Remsen | D | 2-10 | 0.167 |
| Team | Class | Division Record | Win % | |
| 1 | Cooperstown | C | 10-0 | 1.000 |
| 2 | Sauquoit Valley | C | 7-2-1 | 0.750 |
| 3 | Waterville | C | 4-5-1 | 0.450 |
| 4 | Hamilton | D | 4-6-1 | 0.409 |
| 5 | Poland | D | 2-8 | 0.200 |
| 6 | Mt. Markham | C | 2-8-1 | 0.227 |